Houston Card Collector

May 17, 2008

OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG (Astros vs. Rangers)

Filed under: Uncategorized — houstoncollector @ 10:44 pm

So excited.  Have to sleep.  Leaving 9 am tomorrow to go to Arlington to see the Astros blow the hell out of the Rangers.  It’s my first live game in about 30 years or so, and I’m stoked.  Taking a stack of cards to try to get autographed, and a camera for pictures.  Hope to have an update tomorrow night.

If anyone reading this is watching the game, there’s going to be three of us in Astros gear surrounded by Rangers fans on the 3rd base side (Section 15, Rows 16-17).  I’ll be the red-headed guy with the Astros World Series jersey on. :)

SOOOOO excited. :)

April 26, 2008

NFL Draft, Day One

Filed under: Sports Cards — Tags: — houstoncollector @ 7:43 pm

Well, I’ve gotten back from work, and have seen some of the Draft, including Houston’s role in it.  Personally, I’m happy.  Houston trades back from 18th to 26th, picks up an extra 3rd and a 6th round pick….and everything’s solid, then they pick Duane Brown (OT) from Virginia Tech, who they definitely need.

Now the question is, do I collect him?  Historically, linemen have never been really that hot as far as cards go.  I don’t even know what products he’s in yet, but I’m looking.  He’s not listed in either of the SAGE Hit series, although Donnie Avery is in the high series, but not in Aspire at all.  No idea about SAGE Autographed.  Avery’s in Press Pass, but not Duane Brown.  So….for now, Duane Brown probably isn’t going to join my collected list.

However, with Donnie Avery being selected as the first WR taken in the draft (2nd round by the Rams), I’m definitely collecting him, and it’s going to get pricy.

April 18, 2008

Update on 2008 Topps Rookie Progression

Filed under: Sports Cards, Topps — Tags: , — houstoncollector @ 11:21 pm

I have the checklist now, and it’s a 220 card set, with 150ish veterans, 10 or so retired players, and 55 draft picks.  Who am I interested in?

Well, whoever the Texans draft, for one thing.  Beyond that, Matt Schaub, Earl Campbell, Andre Johnson, Mario Williams, and Donnie Avery (UH).  There are a few players that puzzle me, though.  Sage Rosenfels, for one.  Yes, he’s a talented player, but … he’s a backup QB.  Why is he in this set?  He could be much better replaced by DeMeco Ryans or Amobi Okoye on the Texans.

There’s a relic of Donnie Avery, and a Dual with Avery and Marcus Smith (why not Anthony Alridge? or Kevin Kolb?), and a Triple of Avery, Keenan Burton, and Harry Douglas, as well as one with Avery, Donald Driver, and Marcus Smith.  Avery’s also got a Progression Rookie.  Avery gets a total of one autograph in it, in an autographed relic variety, and then he gets a Senior Letter.

What’s interesting is some of the triple signatures they’ve got, such as:  Adrian Peterson, Darrin McFadden…and Jim Brown.  Or how about…Marino, Elway, and Montana?

So…I’m a bit more interested in this set now.

April 17, 2008

2008 Topps Rookie Progression Football First Look

Filed under: Topps — Tags: , — houstoncollector @ 1:55 am

I know, most of you follow baseball, not football.  Bear with me though.  This product replaces Topps Draft Picks & Prospects, which was their first product of the year, at least it looks like it does.  This is a shame, because Rookie Progression looks like a mid-high end product, with 4 base cards a pack, 4 numbered parallel levels, 2 AUs and 2 Relics per box and 10 parallels per box.

It also looks like 10 inserts a box, but what gets me is that they talk about 55 draft picks….but is that all there is?  The sell sheet really doesn’t go into detail, and that leaves me pretty cold on this product, to be honest.

2008 Topps Chrome First Look

Filed under: Topps — Tags: — houstoncollector @ 1:51 am

In 2007, Topps Chrome really made me happy, especially in the retail sector, with retail-only Xfractors (I think) and parallels seeded at 1 per pack.  Yes, the hobby packs had better odds on the autographs and the numbered parallels, but the blue refractors and Xfractors were plentiful in the retail sector.

This year, Topps Chrome claims all new images in their set of 255 cards (170 pros, 50 ‘rookies’ and 35 autographed ‘rookies’ which will probably only be the box hits, coming at 2 per hobby box).

The twists this year include new Copper parallels, numbered to 599, and Topps Heritage Chrome parallels which continue the numbering from 2008 Topps Heritage, and are numbered at 1959, 559, and 59.

So, who do I want out of 2008 Topps Chrome?  Roy Oswalt, Hunter Pence, J.R. Towles, Felipe Paulino (both are AU-only, of course), and any other RCs that they announce later.  There’s also Topps Heritage Chrome parallels of J.R. Towles, and Baseball card History of Hunter Pence and Lance Berkman, with Chrome All-Rookie Team Cards of Pence and Oswalt.

2008 Bowman First Look

Filed under: Bowman, Sports Cards — Tags: , , — houstoncollector @ 1:41 am

I know, everyone else has already looked at these.  This product I’ll probably actually buy, if for no other reason, than to pick up on Prospects that might be worth trading off down the line for more Astros (and I probably have some from 2006 and so on buried in my boxes just waiting to be found again).

So let’s see what we got.  Gee.  Chrome Autographed Prospects…one per box.  Mmm…that might be worth picking up a box down the line.  Then again, with my luck it’ll be some dude that was drafted in the 18th round, and will never get beyond AA ball.  Who knows?

Autographed Scout Cards?  WTF.  Can you really tell me that anyone WANTS these, unless the scouts happen to also be retired major league players?  What a waste of a damn card.  Seems like there’s 1 AU per hobby box, but 3 per HTA box.  Might be worth the $80 or so one of those will set you back.

Looks like Bowman’s going with the standard two-sets-within-a-set that they’ve done since 2006, with 200 veterans, 20 ‘RC’ cards, and 110 prospects, which will also have Chrome parallels.  Oh, but wait!  Topps has found another way to screw people, by inserting autographed rookie cards as PART OF THE MAIN SET, numbered 221-230, available ONE PER HTA BOX.  That means one of the 3 AUs in that HTA box is going to be from that.  Which means, if you want a full set, you’ve got to either buy at minimum TEN HTA BOXES, or spend a lot of time on Ebay.  Way to fuck up a good thing there, Topps.

Looks like we get 4 prospects per pack (presuming Hobby/Retail here, not HTA), with 2 being normal and 2 being Chrome.  What’s nice is there’s guaranteed a card I want, as Max Sapp is featured in the sell sheet.  Wonder how hard it’d be to complete HIS rainbow?

Oh.  Wait.  Remember those autographed Chrome Prospects earlier?  Guess what.  PART OF THE BASE SET, numbered BC111-BCP135.  What a fucking crock of shit this is.  It’s a good thing for me that I don’t build sets of Bowman, but … for the people who do, they’re so totally screwed this year.  Watch.  Topps will pull this same shit in Bowman Chrome.  And then in Football, also.

3 AUs per HTA box?  Sure.  But one of them is the box loader.  So, those 3 autographs are pretty much guaranteed to be a Signs of the Future Card, an Autograped RC, and an Autographed Prospect.  And the scouts fit in there somewhere.

I’m not seeing how many parallels are in a box, but Golds are unnumbered, and seeded 1:3 packs.  Except in HTA, which guarantee one parallel, which will almost always be a Gold.  Figure probably 3-4 non-gold per HTA box if that.  So.  Will I buy a box?  Probably not until later this year.  Besides, why do that when I can go pull a box of 1998 product, or 2002 or 2005 …. for less?

2008 Topps Co-Signers First Impressions

Filed under: Sports Cards, Topps — Tags: , , — houstoncollector @ 1:25 am

I have here the sell sheets for 2008 Topps Co-Signers.  I know, other people have probably already pored over them, but I haven’t, and it’s probably the closest I’ll get to actually seeing this this year (barring a job change, Ihopeihope), so here we go.

115 subjects, broken down into 75 veterans, 25 ‘rookies’ (5 of which also come autographed) and 15 ‘rookies’ which are autograph-only.

As usual, you have your standard 6 cards a pack, 12 packs a box, with each pack having either a parallel (9 per box) or an autograph (3 per box, 2 singles, 1 dual, with the case hit being a huge variety of….)

Wait a minute.  What in the HELL are they doing?  BOXER AUTOGRAPHS?  IN A BASEBALL PRODUCT?

Well, that makes it official.  I’ll be picking up Astros singles, and Topps can go jump in a lake.  $10 a pack, $100+ a box, and BOXERS?  Screw that noise.

April 4, 2008

Reflections Upon The State of the Hobby, Beckett, Dr. Wax, Et al

Filed under: Uncategorized — houstoncollector @ 3:16 am

Lately, there’s been a bit of a …. well, I’ll be nice and call it a bit of a confusing mess about the state of the hobby.  A lot of it ties into the seeming disparity between what is promoted as being in a product via various video box breaks from Topps and Beckett and others, and what is actually showing up on store shelves and in collector’s hands.

First, there was this box break from the folks at Cards Infinity, which … let’s just say that they weren’t too thrilled with it, although they pulled an Andre Johnson that I’d adore.  This was followed by a video which was made in response not only to this, but also to a recent break on Beckett.com, where a case of the same product (2007 UD Exquisite Football, in this case) was broken, with some hits that, were I to pull any of them, would likely run screaming out of the room, and leave me giddy for hours.  Granted, I’ve only ever pulled 1 1/1 in my life, so there’s that.  That video was followed by the one from Beckett, with some pretty wicked commentary, and then again by one featuring a call to Upper Deck themselves about this.  The blogosphere has been touching on the topic for the past week or two, and Wednesday, Dr. Wax got into the act, complete with guests from The Brill Report, Beckett, and others, and after watching this, I wanted to give my own observations.

1)  Sticker autos.  While I understand the reasoning behind these, it’s looking like more and more the stickers are the standard way of putting autographs on cards.  I’m holding a stack of autographed cards in my hand right now, and out of eight autographed cards, six of them are stickered, one is on-card, and the other one is on white cardstock inside the card itself.  And these are probably somewhat acceptable for the lower to middle value products.  But when you get to any product where the purchase price of a pack is over, say, $20 (basically anything from Leaf Limited / Topps Sterling / Bowman Sterling and up) there should be no stickered autos.  Especially not in UD Black, Exquisite, National Treasures and so on.  This is completely unacceptable.

2)  Quality of autographs.  This isn’t so much talking about the autographs themselves, but who is autographed.  Rookies are always a good autograph for collectors, even if they’re a no-name right now, they might break out later.  I don’t have a problem with that.  Same goes for stars and HOF members.  These men deserve to have autograph cards of them.  But a second-string wide receiver?  A backup catcher?  A middle reliever?  Unless it’s a rookie card, they shouldn’t be doing autographs.  The only people collecting them are team collectors or player collectors, and let’s be honest, we’re a small subset of collectors.  If I’m buying a pack of cards, and especially if that pack runs me $50 or more, I should not be pulling an autograph of a scrub.  If I’m buying a box of Bowman Chrome baseball, the autograph in the box should not be of someone who was drafted five years ago and is still in the minor leagues at the AA level.   This, again, is completely unacceptable.

3)  Game-used cards.  Ten years ago, these were the best thing out there.  Finding a swatch from a guy you love was enough to keep you happy for ages.  Now?  They’re crap cards.  Part of this is because there are so many of these cards.  Another part of the reason is because the huge majority of the cards are single-color swatches, predominately white.  While this might be fine in a base set, or a lower-middle end set, at no time should these be used on a serial-numbered card.  If you can’t at least give us a splash of color, why are you limiting it?  What’s so special about it?  Likewise patch cards where the patch is a swatch of white with a bit of stitching, or perhaps white with a bare edge of black or another color.  These are not patches.  These are cop-outs, and they are not acceptable.  I should not pull a card numbered to 50 where it’s a freaking white swatch.  I most definitely should not pull this out of a high-end product, and I’m looking at all the card companies on this one.

4)  It’s all about the hits.  Okay, this one is my personal pet peeve.  When I was growing up, and yeah, I’m talking about the 80s here, it was all about finding the rookies and the stars, and completing the sets.  Sure, there were a few errors, and maybe some of the rookies might have been short prints, and speculation was running rampant.  But it wasn’t like it is now.  Today, if a box doesn’t guarantee at least 2-3 AU/GU in it, it’s considered crap.  How do the companies make these products?  Lots of the above:  single-colored swatches and sticker autographs of players many people don’t care about.  This has devalued the market for just about everything, and is why you find memorabilia cards of hall of famers valued at next to nothing.  On one hand, this is good because a collector can go on Ebay or Naxcom and buy just about anything they want, but on the other hand, it’s not good because that same collector has to get so many more things in order to have a collection that’s even remotely ‘complete’.  And let’s not even start on the overuse of parallels.  This actually affects trading, also, as many collectors / traders immediately only wish to trade for these items, and consider a base card next to worthless.  Personally, if you’ve got $50 worth of cards I want, I’ll gladly trade you $50 worth of AU/GU, but try getting someone to do that the other way around for the most part, and you get laughed at.

5)  Too many products.  Let’s be serious here.  For baseball, we have over twenty products coming out this year, spread between two manufacturers, with prices ranging from 99 cents up to $500.  Of those products, the majority of them will be between $3 and $10, with boxes running on average around $50-100.   Set collectors have it pretty bad, unless they limit themselves to one set (or two, one for each manufacturer).  Player and team collectors?  That’s a lot of wax to buy, or to trade for.  We’re forgetting that the hobby was originally aimed at the children (in the 50s through the 80s) to the point where we only aim one set per manufacturer at them.   And then, of course, there’s hobby vs. retail, and the differences between them, including fewer hits, items which are only in hobby packs (or only in retail packs) and hobby-only PRODUCTS and what it all adds up to is splintering of the hobby.

Personally, I would love to spend time in a hobby shop and get all of my cards from there.  Unfortunately, the hobby shop is a dying breed, and many of them aren’t nearly as fun as they used to be.  For example, I’ve only got one shop within driving distance (40 miles) from me, and they’re always overpriced by at least 10%.  I would love to buy packs online, but then you have to handle shipping rates, which makes it uneconomical.  I could buy packs on Ebay, but so many of the people there are pack-searchers, which is only good if I just want base cards (and while I complain about it being only about the hit, I like getting the hits just as much as anyone else, I just don’t solely collect them), and then there’s shipping on top of that.

6)  The Companies are Lazy.  We all know this one is true.  The error cards, the crap mirror inserts that very few people collect (Generation Now, HR History, Flight to 420) or can actually collect (Yankee Stadium Legacy).  On top of that, you’ve got cards of players who have switched teams prior to the season with bad airbrush jobs, when they bother to airbrush them at all, such as the pack of 2008 Topps Opening Day with a Miguel Tejada card….showing him with the Orioles.  What, they couldn’t even airbrush the photograph in the nearly six months since he signed with the Astros?  Similar things happened in 2007, when David Carr was cut by the Texans in February.  When the sets started coming out in June and July, many of them showed him on the Texans, even though by then he was already well-entrenched (for a short time) with the Panthers.  And then there’re the gimmicks.  Alex Gordon in 2006.  Derek Jeter, Joba, Poley Walnuts and the like in 2007.  Guiliani, the April Fool’s Joke, the Presidential cards and Hilary in 2008.  This is getting way out of hand, and it’s not really fun anymore.

In closing, I just want to say to Topps, Playoff/Donruss, Upper Deck, Press Pass and SA-GE…please, please…make the hobby fun again, and make it about collecting, not just ‘what can I get from this box’.

Keep On Collecting.

March 31, 2008

Collecting Astros, Craig Biggio

Filed under: Uncategorized — houstoncollector @ 9:45 pm

I love Craig Biggio.  Got me a big old man-crush on him.  He’s an old-school ball player, playing with the Astros from day one, and always willing to do whatever was necessary to play.  Change from catcher to second base?  Sure, and make the All-Star team at each position.  Second to Center Field?  Naturally.  Center field back to Second?  Of course!  3000 hits?  Not a problem!  First Ballot Hall of Fame?  You damn well better believe it.

I’ve got 213 of his cards, although I’ve yet to get either of the 1988 rookies of him.  List after the break.

(more…)

March 30, 2008

Collecting Astros, Nolan Ryan

Filed under: Uncategorized — houstoncollector @ 10:35 pm

The Ryan Express. Even though he went into the Hall of Fame as a Ranger, I will always be a fan of Nolan Ryan. Most of my collection of him are base and inserts, with one GU and one oddball that I cannot find information about (scan forthcoming). There’re so many cards I’d love to have of him, including Autographs, but of course the holy grails are the 1968 Topps and 1968 Topps Venezuelan issues.

Naturally, what I have is after the cut.

(more…)

Older Posts »

Blog at WordPress.com.